Who it's for
Three kinds of team, one assessment standard.
Anyone evaluating, running or scaling automation already carries this problem and already spends money on it. We're not creating new spend — we're replacing the spreadsheet it currently sits in.
Segment 01
Enterprise operations, transformation & CoE teams
Used by business analysts, product owners, and centre-of-excellence and transformation leads.
What's broken today
Every analyst assesses differently. Two people evaluate comparable processes and reach incompatible conclusions, because the model lives in whichever spreadsheet they inherited. The backlog grows faster than anyone can triage it, so decisions get made on instinct and audited afterwards.
What changes
- One assessment methodology across the whole organisation
- Ad-hoc Excel models retired, with the workings preserved
- A defensible evidence trail behind every GO and every NO-GO
- Portfolio-level view of where the value actually sits
Segment 02
Transformation & automation consultancies
Used by consultants and delivery leads across client engagements.
What's broken today
Discovery gets rebuilt from scratch on every engagement. The quality of the assessment depends on which consultant ran it, and the deliverable is a bespoke spreadsheet that can't be compared against the last client's — or defended six months later when the client asks how a number was reached.
What changes
- A repeatable discovery method for every engagement
- The same rigour and the same deliverable regardless of who runs it
- Assessment cycles measured in days rather than weeks
- A branded, professional output the client can circulate internally
Segment 03
Automation platform vendors
White-label and OEM licensing — your platform, your branding, a real methodology underneath.
What's broken today
The business case your customers see is a spreadsheet. FTE count times handling time times hourly rate — a single benefit line, calculated once, with no methodology behind it and no way to defend it when their finance function pushes back. Deals stall in procurement on a number nobody trusts.
And nothing in that calculator tells the customer which of their processes to bring to your platform. They guess, pick badly, and the deployment that follows becomes your reference story whether it worked or not.
What changes
- 20+ benefit categories automatically assessed, not a single FTE line in Excel
- NPV, IRR and payback modelled on your platform — your business case, no competitors shown
- Process-level recommendations telling customers what to automate first, and what to leave
- A defensible method behind the number, so business cases survive procurement
- Better-qualified pipeline: fewer deployments that were never viable
- White-label or OEM licensing, with per-assessment terms available
Plans
Priced to the way each team works.
We're in pilot, and pricing is being set alongside the first cohort rather than guessed at in advance. Talk to us and we'll size it against your volume.
Team
For consultancies and delivery teams running assessments across engagements.
- Per-seat or agency multi-seat
- Full assessment and business case export
- Portfolio across all engagements
Enterprise
For operations, transformation and CoE functions standardising across the organisation.
- Platform fee with seat and volume tiers
- Assessment-volume tiers keep AI cost predictable
- Single sign-on and data privacy baseline
White-label / OEM
For automation platform vendors embedding assessment into their own ecosystem.
- Licence or per-assessment royalty
- Your branding, your environment
- Single-vendor mode — only your platform is modelled
Not sure which one you are?
Tell us how your team assesses processes today and we'll tell you honestly whether this helps.